Certified Legal Professional (CLP) Practice Exam

Is it permissible for an attorney to threaten a client over non-payment?

1. Yes, this is standard practice

2. No, it undermines professional integrity

3. Yes, intimidation can be a negotiating tool

4. No, such actions are strictly forbidden

The correct answer is: No, it undermines professional integrity

The assertion that it is not permissible for an attorney to threaten a client over non-payment is rooted in the core principles of professional conduct and ethics that govern legal practice. Attorneys are bound by rules that prioritize professionalism, integrity, and the maintenance of a trustworthy attorney-client relationship. Threatening a client not only undermines these ethical standards but can also lead to serious repercussions, including disciplinary action against the attorney by professional licensing boards. In the legal profession, maintaining an open and communicative relationship with clients is essential. If a client is facing issues regarding payment, the appropriate course of action for an attorney would be to address the situation transparently, explore payment plans, or discuss potential solutions rather than resorting to intimidation or threats. These kinds of actions threaten to erode the trust necessary for an effective attorney-client relationship and could potentially harm the client’s well-being, further complicating their legal issues. Moreover, attorneys are expected to act in their clients' best interests, and using threats as a leverage point deviates from this obligation. The rules of professional conduct specifically prohibit such behaviors as they are not only unethical but can also lead to a negative public perception of the legal profession. In contrast, the other options presented suggest various forms of acceptance of intimidation, which